Posts Tagged ‘casting’

twilightSo much for consistency! In another wild and predictable move (predictable in my opinion), it looks like another Twilight cast member has been replaced…and it’s definitely created more drama than the movie themselves.

It was reported yesterday that Rachelle Lefevre, who plays the evil vampire Victoria in all of the films, had been replaced by the great Bryce Dallas Howard for The Twilight Saga: Eclipse, which is the 3rd book in the series. According to the reports, “scheduling conflicts” was the reasoning behind the sudden change, but as of today, new information that has come out has caused an uproar.

Below is a statement by Rachelle Lefevre herself claiming that she never knew about being “let go” from the Twilight films in favor of Bryce Dallas Howard: (as told to EW)

I was stunned by Summit’s decision to recast the role of Victoria for Eclipse. I was fully committed to the Twilight saga, and to the portrayal of Victoria. I turned down several other film opportunities and, in accordance with my contractual rights, accepted only roles that would involve very short shooting schedules. My commitment to Barney’s Version is only ten days. Summit picked up my option for Eclipse. Although the production schedule for Eclipse is over three months long, Summit said they had a conflict during those ten days and would not accommodate me.

And Summit Entertainment, feeling backed into a corner and publicly humiliated, released their own very political sounding statement:

We at Summit Entertainment are disappointed by Rachelle Lefevre’s recent comments which attempt to make her career choices the fault of the Studio. Her decision to discuss her version of the scheduling challenges publicly has forced the Studio to set the record straight and correct the facts.

– Ms. Lefevre’s representatives were advised as early as April that THE TWILIGHT SAGA: ECLIPSE was expected to start shooting in early August.

- If Ms. Lefevre was, as she describes “passionate,” about being part of THE TWILIGHT SAGA, we feel that she and her representatives would have included us in her decision to work on another film that would conflict with the shooting schedule of THE TWILIGHT SAGA: ECLIPSE.

- It was not until July 20th that Summit was first informed of Ms. Lefevre’s commitment to BARNEY’S VERSION, a commitment we have since been advised she accepted in early June. Summit had acted in good faith that she would be available to fulfill her obligations both in terms of rehearsals and shooting availability for THE TWILIGHT SAGA: ECLIPSE. We feel that her choice to withhold her scheduling conflict information from us can be viewed as a lack of cooperative spirit which affected the entire production.

– Furthermore Ms. Lefevre took a role in the other film that places her in Europe during the required rehearsal time, and at least ten days of THE TWILIGHT SAGA: ECLIPSE’s principal photography. This period is essential for both rehearsal time with the cast, and for filming at key locations that are only available during the initial part of production.

- Contrary to Ms. Lefevre’s statement, it is simply untrue that the Studio dismissed her over a ten day overlap. It is not about a ten day overlap, but instead about the fact that THE TWILIGHT SAGA: ECLIPSE is an ensemble production that has to accommodate the schedules of numerous actors while respecting the established creative vision of the filmmaker and most importantly the story.

The fact remains that Ms. Lefevre’s commitment to the other project – which she chose to withhold from Summit until the last possible moment – makes her unfortunately unavailable to perform the role of Victoria in THE TWILIGHT SAGA: ECLIPSE.

This sounds a lot like what happened with Terrence Howard in Iron Man when he was replaced by Don Cheadle and claims, to this day, that it was a complete surprise to him and that he feels slighted by Warner Bros. I don’t know what’s true and I don’t think we’ll ever know as I’m sure Summit Entertainment will work hard to spin the story the way they want it to go, but I will say this: This is another sign of the failure of Twilight as a movie adaptation. (a big post explaining that is coming)

Why can’t Twilight keep its cast and crew? First the director leaves all of a sudden, then one of the most important and pivotal characters, Jacob, almost gets recast after the first movie, and now this….

Who do you believe? Do you think this will add to the demise of Twilight?

thorI know I haven’t debuted a lot of details for Marvel’s upcoming film Thor and there’s a good reason: there hasn’t been anything of concrete value until now.

A lot of movie sites post every single bit of news about a movie, from the mundane to the amazing, but I don’t have the time nor want to bog you down with details and rumors and tidbits that may have no significance on the film at all. I hear about all of the happenings with films and pick and choose when I want to report it to you, my loyal Truth On Cinema readers.

Movie rumors run rampant on the internet and as fun as it is to dialogue about who should be cast as what and what storyline could be cool, I wanted to wait until we had some OFFICIAL casting news about Thor before I brought it to you.

The wait is over. Over the weekend, Nikki Finke reported and broke the news that Australian actor Chris Hemsworth (who you might recognize as George Kirk in Star Trek) will be donning the hammer in director Kenneth Branagh’s Thor.

thor-chris1

I don’t know much about this guy but from what I saw from him in the first five minutes of Star Trek, I’d say he is a very good pick to play Thor. I have always been a big fan of casting relatively unknowns for an origin superhero film. I think it adds a bit of mystery and intrigue as to how it will turn out. Let’s say they would have cast Brad Pitt as Thor: can someone say Troy?

If you know anything about the Thor universe, and I don’t, or have access to Wikipedia, which I do, then you would know that Thor’s archenemy is none other than Loki. Many casting rumors have been out about who will be playing Loki, with most of them hinting at Josh Hartnett taking the lead, but today, Nikki Finke reported that British actor Tom Hiddleston will be suiting up to battle Thor.

tom-loki1

There is one other casting rumor that I figure you might want to know about since her casting would add some serious credibility to an already unknown cast: the possible casting of Natalie Portman.

actress-natalie-portman-4957821No one knows quite yet who she is rumored to be casting for but Screenrant’s own, “Natalie Portman Expert” Carl Lee, wrote an interesting article listing some of the female character possibilities for Portman to portray in the Thor world.

Thor will begin shooting in January and will hit theaters on June 17, 2011.

Discussion: What do you think about these casting updates? Are you excited about Thor?

Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes

© Copyright Truth On Cinema. All Rights Reserved.