Christopher Nolan has all of the movie world collectively scratching our heads ever since he debuted the enigmatic teaser trailer for his next film, Inception. The trailers don't do much in helping us figure out the film and what it's going to be.

Is it a love story? Is it a corporate espionage thriller? A mind-bender like Memento? The answer is “all of the above,” according to Nolan himself. Whatever it becomes, Mr. Nolan, you have our attention.

From the Hero Complex blog we have learned that Nolan considers this film to be his biggest yet. And he goes as far to say that it's even bigger than the monumental Dark Knight.

“This is the biggest challenge I’ve taken on to this point,” said Nolan, “We’re trying to tell a story on a massive scale, a true blockbuster scale – the biggest I’ve ever been involved with. We tried to make a very large-scale film with ‘The Dark Knight’ and with this one we wanted to push that even further.”

What influences a director like Nolan to create the rich and multi-level films that he does?

"I grew up watching James Bond films and loving those and watching spy movies with their globetrotting sensibility.... We get to do that here, not just geographically but also in time and dimensions of reality as well. We get to make a movie that’s expansive, I suppose you’d say, in four dimensions.”

Did you catch that? 4 dimensions?! What does that even mean? The only thing certain at this point is that this will be one of the most anticipated films of 2010.

What do you think? Will Inception make your 2010 Must See list?


Can't you just hear the sirens of the Ecto-1 coming down the street and the theme song pumping in the background, "There's something strange, in the neighborhood, who you gonna call? GHOSTBUSTERS!" If you are like me and grew up in the mighty 80's then you are very familiar with and probably consider Ghostbusters one of your all-time favorite 80's movies...in fact, it probably exists even today in a Top 5 List. It's that timeless!

There has been major talk ever since the release of the Ghostbusters: The Video Game back in June of a 3rd Ghostbusters film and everyone from Bill Murray to Dan Aykroyd to Sigourney Weaver have weighed in on what the status of the project is and what we might see. Weaver dropped a bomb earlier that Murray might be in the third film, but not as himself in the human form, but as a ghost. There also have been plot rumors that involve a newer, younger batch of Ghostbusters that "take up the reigns" with the original cast making cameos to sort of "train up" the young'uns.

Well, the biggest news to come out of the Ghostbusters 3 camp has hit today: the producer/director of the first two films, Ivan Reitman, will be back to direct the third. The Office writers Lee Eisenberg and Gene Stupnitsky are currently working on the 2nd draft and according to Reitman,

They have delivered a draft...we are working our way through another draft… good work is being done and all of us have our fingers crossed. I’m not going to comment on what’s in the script and on what Sigourney may or may not have said....but there are some very cool things in the script now.

I am excited about this news and can't wait to see what Reitman will do with the third film. I'm sure we can expect some pretty technologically advanced weaponry, probably increased usage of CG ghosts, and maybe some modern day slang...but, all I really want to see is some good ole' fashioned comedy. I hope he doesn't get too caught up in "modernizing" it for today's audience.

What do you think about this news? Would you see a third Ghostbusters film? If so, why? If not, why not? Is this a franchise worth continuing?


500 Days of Summer - I really love both Zooey Deschanel and Joseph Gordon-Levitt and for their parts, they were great. But the movie just didn't do it for me. I think that I was expecting a more typical romantic comedy rather than an independent dramedy. It had funny parts, but as a whole it was rather sparse and depressing. I don't want to say that it was a bad movie, but it did not meet my expectations.





Night at the Museum Battle of the Smithsonian - Ok this is clearly the most well known of the films on the list. Ben Stiller returns as Larry the security guard and has to do battle with a Pharaoh (played by the always amusing Hank Azaria). It was alright, but I felt that it didn't capture the same wonder as the first film. It seemed as though it was aimed more at children - as seen by the casting of the Jonas Brothers as singing cherubs on the top of a fountain. Amy Adams as Amelia Earhart was brilliant in spite of everything.



Cold Comfort Farm - An early-in-her-career Kate Beckinsale goes to live with family in the country to get inspiration for the book she plans on writing in the BBC production. Do I really need to tell you anything else? It was rough - I mostly played Mario Kart. Ooh, Mario Kart... I'll be right back.






The Family Man - This is one of my all-time favorite movies. Nic Cage and Tea Leoni are great and I think that it's a wonderful break from director Brett Ratner's typical action fare. It's a modern day "It's a Wonderful Life."






Quantum of Solace - I decided to give this one a second chance since I was given the DVD for Christmas. As I've mentioned previously, I liked the Pierce Brosnan Bond films and I loved Casino Royale. But something about this just comes off as feeling like another installment of the Bourne Identity - shaky camera work, over-the-top action sequences, less than engaging story. Take it for what it's worth.

I am just learning, from Nikki Finke the queen of breaking news, that Sony has decided to scrap plans for the upcoming Spider-Man 4 film and instead reboot the entire franchise without Sam Raimi and company.

According to the report, Raimi apparently told Sony, "I can't make your date. I can't go forward creatively" and as soon as Sony heard that, they immediately scrapped plans for Spider-Man 4 and went into "franchise reboot" mode based on a script by Jamie Vanderbilt with a new director and a new cast.

I think all of us saw this coming with as many problems that the film has had getting off the ground, with script problems, with the amount of casting indecision, with the villain rumors, and even the fact that Raimi wanted to go "back to the basics."

Now, let's start the discussion on the most mysterious part of the story: rebooting the franchise? What's that going to be like? Didn't we already see Peter Parker start from a nerd and turn into Spider-Man? Is there a completely new storyline that hasn't been touched yet? Was Peter Parker actually black?

What do you guys think?

Before I say anything, I need to say this: I don't watch movies as art, I often go for sappy ones, and I have always liked Will Smith (as an actor—he lost my respect as a person when he converted to Scientology. That said, I legitimately enjoyed Seven Pounds. Possibly for those reasons.

The story of one man's struggle to redeem himself of the burdens of guilt and responsibility, Seven Pounds follows Ben Thomas on a mysterious quest to apparently re-invent Robin Hood as an IRS agent. Much of the power of the movie revolves around keeping details a secret, so I will do my best not to ruin anything (even though the basics are pretty easy to figure out). From the beginning, it's obvious that they mean for you to be confused. To put the pieces together yourself only so that they can rearrange them for you later. In this they almost succeed. The dialogue is simple and effective, in a word: believable. Grant Nieporte, who I understand to be a newcomer to the world of movies, is very adept at telling us exactly what he wants to tell us without spoon feeding it to us. He makes Ben a real person in that all his secrets aren't laid out for us to see. We are meant to dissect his motivations and feelings as the movie progresses. This can be challenging, as there are scenes legitimately intended to make us question him. When, in the course of the opening five minutes, Ben had already made disparaging and racist remarks (via phone) to a salesman, I began to wonder if I could in fact stomach the rest of the film...I could.

In fact, I practically devoured it. Even after I had put all the pieces together, the picture I had was one I simply could not resist seeing completed. There were points that brought me to the verge of tears. Not the sad, Hollywood tears that we're meant to cry when a hero dies. Rather, the tears that say “I can't believe that just happened.” Tears that are both joyful and depressed. Ben seems to run his operation on a loose set of guidelines and morals, and it is amazing to watch him implement what he sees as justice. Most of the time, I agreed with his ends while sometimes doubting his means. But given the way the film progressed and eventually ended, that's understandable.

Let's not get ahead of ourselves: the film is far from perfect. There are flashback sections that are, quite frankly, very good at making me feel like something is wrong. Did I just hit the scene skip? No... this is an incredibly oversubtle flashback. These segments are much like American banking of late: Sometimes they work, and sometimes they fail miserably. Add to that a forced romance and the flaws of Seven Pounds start to become an issue. Perhaps suffering from the same subtlety I so recently praised, the romance that develops between Ben and one of his wards, Emily Posa, seems to progress very quickly and seldom logically. At the point wherein he was at her house everyday without her permission (often in her backyard or workshop without her knowledge) and she didn't seem at all worried, I realized there would need to be some suspension of logic here. With that step taken, the film improved tremendously.

By the time the film had reached it's dramatic-if-somewhat-predictable conclusion, I was devoted to it. Smith's dark humor and broken demeanor built marvelously into a very powerful conclusion and I suddenly realized why such are far-fetched relationship was necessary. This is a story of sacrifice, and by the time I was finished watching it, I felt like I was carrying around a few extra pounds of my own. Somehow, despite its flaws, this film got into my head and affected me on a deep level. I felt just a tinge of what Ben felt, and I rejoiced in his final acts. Whether or not the principles behind his plan for self-redemption are sound is something that will vary with the viewer, but no one can deny that what Ben does is incredible. All of his insanity, his energy and pain add up into a beautiful whole for his final scene. And I almost wish they had ended it there.

The closing scene was not bad, per se. It merely failed to live up to the rest of the film's power. It was almost too blatant, too obvious. Like a subtitle that said “In case you didn't get it... here's what happened. Now isn't that wonderful?”

I admit that this review is a bit bipolar, perhaps because it's been tainted by my discussion of the film with others. When I was done watching, I was convinced that I had just been a part of something wonderful. That magic faded in the face of logic and the real world. My advice to you for Seven Pounds is the same as for most movies: don't think too hard. Experience it. That is where it's power lies.

In order to continue to provide a variety of voices here at Truth On Cinema, we are welcoming a new writer to join our family: Steven Jones. Instead of me writing an introduction for him, here's what he had to say about himself and his love for movies:

Steven Jones is a student at Southwestern University in Georgetown, Texas and intends to major in Communication Studies in order to enter the field of broadcasting. He currently runs a radio program at SU Radio and isn't afraid to self-promote by telling you to check out the Facebook group "The Semi-Infinite Playlist".

Steven enjoys a wide variety of movies ranging from comedy to action to sci-fi with brief and occasional stops everywhere else. He loves movies as entertainment and is staunchly opposed to Christopher Kelly's idea that all movies must be ground breaking art. His favorite films include:

Comedy: Get Over It! Simply because there is musical Shakespeare involved. This movie could practically be described as the predecessor to High School Musical, done with more humor (although regrettably by MTV) and featuring just about everything a kid my age can relate to. This includes an over-hyped conception of romance.

Sci-Fi: Because of his addiction to Joss Whedon's Firefly and love of both Alan Tudyk and Nathan Fillion, Serenity takes the cake. I don't recommend it too much if you aren't familiar with the show, however.

Historical Musical: 1776. I created this category specifically so I could mention 1776, which I find immensely entertaining and surprisingly reference-able.

Also, A Knight's Tale, Iron Man, the Resident Evil franchise, the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtle movies (only I and II), Treasure Planet, National Treasure, most Pixar films, and just about anything else I watch.

I love the perspective Steven has on movies and life itself and can't wait to read his DVD Reviews. With him being a college student, I don't know yet how involved, in the beginning at least, he will be on the site, but you can be sure his DVD Reviews will be coming soon.

If you have any questions, comments, compliments, or movie recommendations for Steven, you can email him at stevenajon@gmail.com.

Ryan Reynolds will dawn the green tights in July 2011 to portray The Green Lantern and if you remember back in July we reported on the casting carousel that had many actors fighting for the coveted role. Well, it looks as if the carousel started again for casting Carol Ferris, the leading lady in the film. Among the riders on the carousel (I'm staying on this metaphor until the end) were Keri Russell, Blake Lively, and Jennifer Garner, and it's being reported that Blake Lively of Gossip Girl fame has won the role.

Her character is described as "a woman who who runs her father’s aerospace company and hires cocky test pilot Hal Jordan (Reynolds), who later becomes the intergalactic policeman Green Lantern. In the comics, the romance became complicated when an alien race bestowed her the power of a crystal called the Star Sapphire."

What do you think of this news? Comic Book guys, will she make a good Carol Ferris?

Thanks to the FilmStage, we have the first ever trailer for The A-Team! Check it out below and let us know what you think about it. The trailer has officially been taken down. That'll teach me to jump on a news story too quickly without waiting for the OFFICIAL word to precede the release.

Sorry to all my Truth On Cinema readers who a) didn't get to see it the short time that it was available, and b) have to endure an entire post talking about how I don't have something late-breaking.

I can't say that my first reaction was a positive one at this point. I am still trying to process through it all. I know it's more modern and yet cheesy at the same time, but one thing is for sure, this isn't the A-Team we grew up with! Sharlto Copley's Murdock, though, is going to be a popular character. His southern accent is at first a little off-putting, but over the course of the trailer, it gets funnier.

What do you think of the trailer?

I know what you're thinking, "Dan, really?! Haven't we gotten a little out of control with our sequels?! Twister?! What next, the crew chasing MORE tornadoes?" And I would agree with you on principle.....BUT COME ON, it's Twister!! If you know me then you know I have an unhealthy obsession with tornadoes and at one point in my life even wanted to be a storm chaser. Twister is one of my favorite guilty pleasure movies to pop in on a lazy Saturday and relax to. There's nothing better than seeing CG tornadoes rip apart a wooden house or cows flying around.

Premium Hollywood did an extensive interview with the great Bill Paxton and he talked in length about his hopes for a sequel to the 1996 hit. He has already had a meeting with DreamWorks executive Kathleen Kennedy and in the interview he details where his inspiration for a second film came from:

I flew into St. Louis with my buddy Scott Thomson, who played Preacher in ‘Twister,’ and we rented a car and drove down to southeastern Missouri, into the Ozarks...and we started tracking the trail of the most famous tornado that ever hit the country, which was the Tri-State Tornado of 1925...So we just did that to kind of get some ideas, and from that I kind of extrapolated an idea for a sequel. And I kind of put that together into a format, and now we’re kind of waiting to see if that’s going to move forward. That would need Steven Spielberg’s blessing, ultimately, and they probably won’t take it to him ‘til there’s real studio interest, but I think the 3D applications of that could obviously be pretty amazing.

That's right, he said 3D! Can you imagine what a Twister movie made in this decade in 3D would look like?! I am not sure what direction they would go, and it looks as if Paxton has already thought about that as he addressed the tone of the sequel:

The only reason I’d like to revisit that ground is because I realize we’re living in a time where big movies cost so much to make that the town is looking for built-in audiences...but…I always thought the first ‘Twister’ was an exciting ride, but I thought a sequel could explore it in a more enthralling way, getting into more of the history and the lore, more of a darker version of the first one.

So, what do you think about the possibility of a second Twister? I can't say that I've ever been hoping for a sequel, but Bill Paxton is great in anything he does and if he's behind the wheel, then I am on board!


I've been reading a lot of news recently about financial concerns affecting some of the big movie franchises - specifically Terminator and James Bond. And it's really gotten me to wondering if the great franchises are really all that great or are we just fascinated by recurring characters the alternate universes that these films create.

Here are a few to think about?

Terminator

Terminator: The first one was groundbreaking and the second was genre defining (sci-fi). Even though the hype machines have continued, the remaining installments have really failed to live up to their predecessors. Of course, it would be hard for anything to live up to such monumental films. I own all of the films as well as both seasons of Sarah Connor Chronicles, so I feel confident in my evaluation of the series and I have to say, now, that as a franchise, it's really not as great as it could be or I wish it were.

James Bond

James Bond: I'm biased because I don't care for films made before 1978. As such, I haven't watched any pre-Pierce Brosnan installments of this film. I really enjoyed those four, however. Then came Casino Royale and it blew my mind for what a James Bond film could be - and I think that a lot of viewers echoed those sentiments. When I finally got around to watching Quantum of Solace (or Bourne 4 as I call it) I was really disappointed. I think that we all love 007 as a character and concept, but the fact is that these films are really not that amazing - though there are a few gems in the collection.

Star Wars

Star Wars: No doubt, episodes 4-6 are unbelievable. I haven't seen any of the animated stuff (and there seems to be a lot of it now). I read a few of the books many years ago. Here's the deal, though, the original story is great. The concept behind the Episodes 1-3 story (well, really just the Vader/Clone/Empire origin part) is great. But what's become of the franchise and all the other off-shoots are passable. But the truth is, we should have realized this years ago when they tried to hock The Ewok Adventure on us.

Batman

Batman: I'm a fan boy. I'll admit it up front. I don't care for DC as a publisher, but I love Batman. And I have to say that Batman on film is greatness. And I won't even try to make excuses for Joel Schumacher (Batman Forever, Batman & Robin). The animated stuff has been great. The films have been great. But, here's the rub, Batman isn't really a film property, it's a comic, so it doesn't really qualify.

Ok, let the arrows fly. What do you think?
Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes

© Copyright Truth On Cinema. All Rights Reserved.