I don’t normally walk out of a movie theater due to a film being so terrible because I can typically find something positive and worth watching in most movies. I am a positive guy and can really appreciate the movie-making process to the point of never really hating a movie. This movie absolutely PUSHED the limits of my positivity.

Seriously, there was nothing good about this film. Now, I don’t often say that about any film or use those kinds of descriptive words…but really folks, this movie isn’t worth anything. I saw this movie with my wife and another couple and if it wasn’t for our dear friendship with this couple, I would have wholeheartedly objected to even considering seeing this movie. The story was laughable, the characters were boring, the CGI was silly, and the whole concept was just pathetic.

It should have been a HUGE warning sign to Brendan Fraser and the rest of the cast when Rachel Weisz decided not to reprise her role after reading the script. Yeah, I agree with her. I can imagine her reading the script and laughing while she threw it in the trash can. The characters were so cliche and boring, and at times, you could visibly see the uncomfortable-ness in Brendan as he tried to resurrect a character that wasn’t great enough to begin with and try and feign some chemistry with an actress not even half the caliber as Weisz. By the way, isn’t about time for Brendan to try and step out of the “family friendly” roles for a bit? He plays basically the same guy in every movie, and all with the same haircut. I’m just saying.

Maria Bello stepped in to replace Rachel and performed just as expected, forgettable and cheap. There was nothing about her role that was unique, she was a half-as-talented blond version of Weisz with a bad British accent. The directors even tried to throw in a little joke at the beginning about her character “becoming a completely new person” as to try and get us to laugh and forget that we’re supposed to believe that THIS IS THE SAME PERSON!

Even the CGI, which has always been pretty cool in the Mummy world, was over the top. They “wow’ed” us with the “sand-time” and “peeling-away-flesh-and-particles” effects in the first Mummy and tried to keep it going in the 2nd, but in this movie, it just feels old and tried. We get it, you’ve perfected the art of blowing sand and eroding particles…what else do you have? Is that it?

The only highlight for me throughout the entire film was John Hannah. Once again he reprises his role as the comic-relief brother-in-law Jonathan, who always manages to bring the audience back to earth with his witty one-liners, all the while making fun of himself and the movie…it’s very subtle. Without him in this movie, I might have walked out. He doesn’t save the movie or even make it for me, he just kept me in my seat and saved me $9 of waste.

Before you rip me a new one, let me tell you that I did like the original Mummy. I thought the action was great, the “sand-time” CGI was new and cool looking (the first time it was cool, not the 132nd time the producers used it), the chemistry between Fraser and Weisz was spot-on, and the story, although out of this world, was entertaining. To me, this movie was a cash-cow-cop-out. It was nothing more than a summer sequel to a franchise that was over after it started. Don’t waste your time or your money.

Content Warning: Rated PG-13 for adventure action and violence. There are a lot of pointless battle scenes involving dead creatures, so no real blood.

Movie News (8/11/08): Thanks to TrekMovie.com for these 4 new character posters for the upcoming J.J. Abrams’ directed Star Trek movie that will hit theaters next summer.

The images are (from left to right) of John Cho (Sulu), Simon Pegg (Scotty), Anton Yelchin (Chekov), and Karl Urban (McCoy).


What do you guys think? Is anyone excited about this fresh look at Star Trek? Do these posters excite you at all?

Movie Rumors (8/6/2008): From the department of “Sequels We Wanted to See as a Kid but Are Now Too Late” comes this latest rumor tidbit from our friends over at Movieweb. According to an “anonymous source,” Warner Bros. is not only setting up a The Goonies 2 film, but it will be a theatrical release as well. From the article on Moviehole, “…a source at Warner Bros has since confirmed this – saying they are developing it as a major movie, but won’t share anything other than that. Nothing we didn’t already know though.”

What do you think? Does this excite you any? Can it survive in today’s modern movie world? Will it be a CG nightmare, or will they rely on classic special effects like the original? Look for this rumor to be proven wrong pretty soon…this one seems too good to be true.

Movie News (8/4/08): It appears that the rumors last week of Johnny Depp being considered for the role of the Mad Hatter in Tim Burton’s upcoming adaptation of Alice in Wonderland are indeed true, according to a local newspaper in England where the film is shooting.

Johnny Depp as the Mad Hatter? Is anyone else surprised that he would team up with Tim Burton? And in case you are wondering who is going to play Alice, below is a picture of the Australian actress chosen to portray her, her name is Mia Wasikowska.

Movie News (7/30/2008): It just goes to show you how fast movie news changes and how quickly rumors become just that, rumors…MTV News has the official word on what the new Robocop movie will be from the producers themselves…

“None of [the earlier films are] going to be canonical, as a matter of fact. I wouldn’t say it’s a direct sequel” says Brad Fischer of the project due out in 2010.

Movie News (7/30/2008): The first teaser poster for next summer’s Terminator sequel Terminator Salvation has gone online and ToC has the exclusive first look.

This poster looks awesome! The texturing done on the face is so gritty and an awesome lead in to how this film will resemble, a more gritty, raw, realistic look at the rise of the machines and the fight to save mankind. What do you think?

Movie News (7/29/2008): The first teaser trailer for Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince will go online tonight at 9pm EST, but USA Today has revealed the first pictures of young Tom Riddle (aka Voldemort), who is being played by Hero Fiennes-Tiffin, the nephew of Voldemort himself Ralph Fiennes. Along with the picture of Tom Riddle, USA Today also has an awesome action shot of Dumbledore.

I can’t wait to see this movie and continue on our trek of reading through and watching all of the Harry Potter films.

Movie Trailer (7/25/2008): Here is the HD version of The Day The Earth Stood Still trailer that is blowing people away. I’ve read some accounts from Comic Con from people at the panel for this movie, and the buzz is clearly beginning to build for this movie. This film is not a re-make of the original, it’s more of a re-imagining of the original. Enjoy the trailer!

Movie News (7/22/2008): Over at Dark Horizons they did an interview with the stars of Friday’s big opening “X-Files: I Want To Believe” David Duchovny and Gillian Anderson, and in the interview they reveal a lot of details about filming the much anticipated sequel, like the 18-below zero degree temperature in Canada during filming, how they both have matured since the first movie, etc. Check out the interview here.

Are you guys excited about this movie? I know there are TONS of little X-Files communities that literally can’t wait for this movie, and I just am not that over the top interested, I mean, I will see the movie, but I’m not going crazy. Did any of you guys ever watch the TV show religiously? Are you fanatics?

Finally.

That first word totally sums it up for me…finally. After all of the waiting and anticipation, I got to see The Dark Knight and it delivered, it truly delivered. After nearly 3 years since the first *NEW* Batman, I finally was able to see The Dark Knight. Choosing to wait out the massive crowds on opening night and weekend, I ventured out on a bright Sunday afternoon to experience this epic movie. With expectations as high as ever in tow, I watched The Dark Knight…

…and it was absolutely fantastic. I walked out of the theater mesmerized and a little short of breath, and in fact, I needed time to sit and recollect on what I just experienced. There was so much in the movie and it was such a BIG movie that there was no way I could even express what I felt or thought until I had a chance to sit down and actually verbalize what I thought. I was overwhelmed by the movie, by the shear mass of it I was taken for a loss. I had waited so long and had such high hopes and had talked about it to nearly everyone I knew, and wrote countless news pieces and insights into the movie that I nearly didn’t know how to even start this review.

I was afraid going into the movie that the hype would outlast the reality of the screen, though I wasn’t as freaked out about it as some other film bloggers, I was at least wary of the fact, but it seriously and utterly lived and surpassed the hype following it. So much goes into the marketing of a movie and many were calling TDK an “over-marketed” movie with all of its viral sites and teasers and trailers debuting here and there, and I am here to tell you, once again, that you will totally forget that fact once you see this movie. I thought that the movie held up great against its “image” that was created prior to its release, there’s never a point where you feel like you were cheated by the amount of information and games that the studios made you play in order to find out anything about the movie. It just adds to the overall phenomenon surrounding the movie.

I think I am going to devote an entire blog to Heath Ledger and why I think he is the best comic book villain to-date to ever appear on screen. His performance ALONE is worth seeing the movie multiple times in the theater. I have never, well, maybe not since Anthony Hopkins in Silence of the Lambs, forgotten about an actor and legitimately believed I was watching a real person like I did watching Ledger portray The Joker. In most cases, I see the ACTOR portraying a character, I see Christian Bale as Batman, I can see Michael Caine as Alfred, but with Ledger, I didn’t see him AS The Joker, I just saw THE JOKER!! I was totally frightened and amazed at The Joker. His evil was unexplainable, which made it all the better, and he seemed to really and truly embody what The Joker should be…someone who is pure evil, not made evil by some abusive childhood or turned by a tragic event, but someone who just IS evil for evil’s sake. Watching Ledger become Joker was true magic, and to be honest, a little disheartening to think how much he would have had to do to prepare for that role mentally, how depressed, low, insane, lonely he had to become to wholeheartedly become Joker. I read that he spent an entire month in a small run-down apartment in a dangerous and shabby part of New York to learn what that kind of loneliness felt like…hindsight in that situation makes you think a little.

Trust me, don’t believe the hype or the stories you read, Ledger makes this movie stand out on its own. Yes, he was SO GREAT that it did expose how just GOOD Christian Bale, Michael Cane, Gary Oldman, etc. were, in that he absolutely OUT SHINED his costars, but not so much as to ruin the movie. It just reminds you how GREAT Ledger was. You can tell that he put everything, literally everything, into this role and sadly enough, from what I have read, the added stress of preparing for a role as dark as this one may have been too much in the end.

One of the things that bothered me about this movie (I know, half of you just gasped, but hear me out) was the splotchy and fidgety editing. I was really bothered by how at times the scene would cut way too fast to the next scene that was already in progress, and it just really distracted me. At multiple times, there were action scenes that were cut too tight and seemed to end too quickly without any resolution at all. I felt like they had SO MUCH MOVIE to cut and edit that in the end, I think they spent too much time slimming the movie to 2 and a half hours and didn’t concentrate enough on how scenes flowed together. The transitions didn’t match at times and it just seemed a little robotic in its flow.

The Nolan brothers’ script I thought was very well put together and flowed nicely. The story really moved quite well in my opinion and never left you guessing. One of the elements of the story that I didn’t quite like and noticed right away was the “over-villain-izing” that was going on. Like the debacle that was Spider-Man 3 with all 3 of their MAJOR villains trying to split time in a 2 hour movie, I thought the inclusion of Two-Face (Dent), The Joker, Gamble, The Mob, AND the Scarecrow (though his was a small part) was a little much to try and cram into the movie, even though it was 2 and a half hours long. I know that Joker was the MAIN villain and most of the movie revolved around him, but I felt like they tried too hard to show all of the villains on one screen and in one movie.

This was a fantastic movie that I will see again this week. It lived up to its hype and it kept me thinking about it and discussing it days after, which is what a truly great film should aspire to do. This movie will make $300 million in 3 weeks, mark my words!

Content Warning: Rated PG-13 for intense sequences of violence and some menace. The Joker is an evil guy and the kind of darkness portrayed in this film is not for the younger kids. Adults, don’t miss it, but find a sitter.

Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes

© Copyright Truth On Cinema. All Rights Reserved.