
This was probably one of the most talked about films of 2007, and I don’t really mean like it was talked about because of its greatness, it was just talked about because that was the fad…to talk about Juno. This “little quirky indie” movie that came out of nowhere captivated a lot of people, including many adults, and actually created its own niche in the culture. After this movie came out, I remember seeing a lot of little “Juno’s” running around my neighborhood and attending youth group, complete with skinny jeans and random scarfs all wrapped under a brightly-colored hoodie.
Despite its over-hype and the instant cultural-icon it became, this movie was actually really good. It had a heartfelt story, mixed with culturally relevant humor, adolescent hi-jinks, and some pretty vulnerable and memorable performances from the likes of Jennifer Garner, Ellen Page, and Michael Cera. And as much as I wanted to fight not to like this movie and not fall into the mainstream trap that EVERYONE else fell into around me, I couldn’t, because I truly enjoyed this movie.
There is so much to say about Ellen Page. I mean, she went from X-Men as a 4th or 5th character, to starring in this little movie about teen pregnancy, written by a newcomer to the industry, and directed by a famous director’s son…now, if that doesn’t spell “indie” then I don’t know what does. She perfectly portrayed a 2007-2008 teen girl who isn’t “part of the cool crowd” yet is smart and mature enough to make fun of that crowd, while still maintaining her own brand of identity…complete with skinny jeans and scarfs. I tend to agree with other critics about the first 15-20 minutes of dialogue between her and her best friend Leah though, in that I couldn’t understand half of what they were saying. It was almost like Jason Reitman (director) was intentionally trying to establish in the beginning that “this was an indie movie with quirky and fast dialogue, and you won’t be able to keep up.” I needed an urban dictionary to figure out most of the words they were saying. Fortunately, that was about the only time in the movie where it kind of disconnected from the audience. Ellen did a wonderful job of engaging the audience with her “too-cool-for-school” attitude mixed with a subtle vulnerability that I think we could all identify with. She was confident in who she was, yet open and honest enough to display genuine concern for another person’s baby, a baby that just so happens to grow inside of her. I was waiting for the typical selfish teenage girl to come out in Juno, the one I’m so used seeing in most films starring teens these days, but unlike most movies, Reitman decided to stay with a more centered and grounded teenage girl-a phenomenon very much absent in most of cinema.
This movie is tackling an issue, (not so much that it’s a “message movie”) that is very prevalent in our schools and to see Juno handle this life-changing situation with confidence and humor was refreshing. Is this too naive? Would a girl today act that confident in her decision to give up her baby to adoption? Was this too much of a “movie script” to face reality?
Michael Cera did a great job of portraying the same character he does in all of his roles, the understated sidekick to the protagonist with the witty, self-deprecating, and unsure-of-himself comments. He played Paulie Bleeker, Juno’s track star BFF who was the baby’s father and who unconditionally loved Juno for who she was, though Juno had a hard time seeing it. If there was something missing in this movie for me, it was the fact that they didn’t really expound on Bleeker’s story and his reactions to being a daddy. I really wanted to see how he handled the news of becoming a teenage dad because it seems that in all of the media and on the news, we only hear about teenage mommies and what they go through. I know that for the most part, the guys couldn’t care less and abandon the girl, but in this instance Bleeker looked from a distance to be genuinely concerned with the effects of what being a teenage dad would have on his life. I guess it’s just something we’ll have to as an audience discuss and muse about on the Internet and with our friends.
One of the most memorable performances for me was that of Jennifer Garner and what an amazing portrayal she turned in. I fell in love with her character and her vulnerability, and to me, you could have given the Oscar for best performance to her face, because in all of her scenes, it was her expressions, her look of sadness, joy, desperation, that really drove home who she was and how much turmoil she was going through inside. One scene in particular, when Juno runs into her at the mall and tells her to touch her belly to feel the baby kicking, you see this woman who kind of feels like she doesn’t deserve to touch the belly as it’s not hers, yet secretly and desperately wants to feel like she’s a PART of this baby…I won’t give it away, but man, this scene alone could have won the Oscar for Garner in my opinion.
As you can see, I loved this movie. Though I don’t see why it was up for an Oscar, maybe because the Academy felt like a movie that received this much hype might as well be considered, it definitely will make it onto my movie-shelf. Juno had a sweetness to it that you don’t normally find in teeny movies, especially INDIE teeny movies. If you haven’t seen it, and you’re curious about it, take it from me, RENT THIS MOVIE! You will not be let down.
Content Warning: Rated PG-13 for mature thematic material, sexual content and language. It’s a movie with teenagers, so you can expect some language here and there and for the “getting pregnant” scene, it’s done in a way that doesn’t reveal too much sexual material. This movie was surprisingly tastefully done and I was very glad for that. Typically, a movie about high schoolers involves a lot of sexual innuendos, even to go as far as having sex scenes, but Juno did a tasteful job of exploring today’s high school issues without having to be too intense.
oh man, this movie totally wasn’t indie. seriously. jason reitman was confused in interviews because people kept calling it that, as it was his first major studio film. his last film, thank you for smoking, was totally indie, he found the financing and produced it himself. juno was completely a studio film in every way.
i think it’s a good film, mostly because of the performances and jason reitman’s superb directing. the script has so many flaws (not the least of which being the god awful dialog of the first 20 minutes that made me want to kill myself by cutting my heart out with a freakin’ spoon) that it’s hard to understand how it got made without some serious script doctoring, much less see it get nominated for AND WINNNING a freaking oscar for screenplay. especially when there were really unique and well crafted screenplays nominated like lars and the real girl.
in short, it’s ok, but not anywhere near worth the hype that it got. especially since most of the hype is because people want to seem cool for liking an “indie” movie.
Johnny, that’s some great insight you have! I think you’re right about the wanting to like an “indie” movie, because after everyone saw it, I had a lot of people who wouldn’t normally waste a nickel on an “indie” movie come up to me in jubilation that they actually saw and liked an “indie” movie.
I think a lot of people want to be someone who likes indie movies, but most of us don’t know how to classify what an indie movie is. Would one of the characteristics of an “indie” movie be sustaining and creating your own financing?
I think the “indie” phenomenon is worth an entire post, what do you think?
You should absolutely do a post about what makes a film “indie”! I think every teenager should see this movie. It’s so sad yet hopeful at the same time.
well, to be an “indie” movie, you have to be independent. a movie financed by fox, juno, is far from independent.
here’s the difference. when reitman set out to make thank you for smoking, he bought the rights to translate the book into a movie. he wrote the screenplay and went out and found a guy who had millions of dollars that he’d be willing to invest in a movie. then reitman produced the movie from that budget. he had total control and was able to make the movie however he saw fit since he didn’t have a studio telling him what to do.
juno was a project that fox purchased from diablo cody. then they hired jason reitman to direct the film. he didn’t have to find financing for the film himself, but he also didn’t have final say or control over the movie, since fox was financing it they had that right.
That’s a very clear explanation, thanks Johnny. I really do think the whole “indie” debacle is worth an entire post, because I think and I know a lot of people just don’t know what it means.
Are we talking about the the Indiana Jones Movie? Cant wait to see that!
I love those Indie films!
Hahahahahaha! Nice one Drew!
I think many of us out there can relate to Juno on some level when we were in high school. I sure wasn’t the cool kid or anyone near normal for most of my life. I love it that she played guitar! Very wonderful film that I can’t wait to see again and again! Great review, Daniel!