Archive for January, 2009

jonahhexFor those of you that didn’t know, Jonah Hex, DC Comic’s western comic anti-hero, is getting made into a movie. The character of Hex, known for having the right side of his face disfigured and wearing a Confederate army uniform, was a rough-and-tumble gunslinger and part-time bounty hunter whose adventures always ended in blood.

When the news first debuted back in June of 2008, rumors were flying as to who would play the disfigured outlaw and one of actors said to be attached was Thomas Jane. Jane even had his makeup people work up what he would look like with all of the disfigurement like Hex, but it was all to no avail, as he is not going to be starring in the movie. In fact, he never was, he was just trying to get the part. I guess he enjoyed playing The Punisher so much that he wanted to continue in the comic book genre.

thomas-jane-jonah-hex

As it stands right now though, Josh Brolin is attached to play the lead role. Crank directors Mark Neveldine and Brian Taylor were set to helm, but left in November because of “creative differences.” So, who did Warner Brothers get to direct this intense and violent comic book adaptation? Well, it’s none other than Horton Hears a Who director Jimmy Hayward. No, that’s not a typo, nor am I making a joke, that’s the real deal, according to The Hollywood Reporter.

What do you think?

Over the holidays, Entertainment Weekly released some never-before-seen photos from some of the most anticipated movies of 2009. From left to right, we have a new shot of Hugh Jackman as Wolverine in X-Men Origins:Wolverine, Pixar’s next animated adventure Up, a new shot of Harry and Ginny from Harry Potter and the Half Blood Prince (one of my most anticipated films of 2009), a shot of The Comedian from the much anticipated Watchmen film, and finally we have 2 new shots of Christian Bale as John Connor in Terminator Salvation and Johnny Depp as John Dilinger in Michael Mann’s upcoming action thriller Public Enemies.

wolverine pixar-up half-blood-prince

the-watchmen terminator-john-connor public-enemies

You can check out the full gallery here which include many more films that didn’t quite make the ToC cut. Though, with one exception, Spike Jonze’s upcoming film Where The Wild Things Are, that one is very interesting to me, and one that I can’t wait to see. The photos aren’t amazing nor do they blow me away, but it’s nice to have some images to start out 2009 with…especially from films I am really looking forward to seeing.

What do you think?

Happy 2009

Happy 2009! Welcome back to Truth On Cinema! As you may have noticed, things are a little different around here. We are back at full steam with a completely new look for 2009. It will take some getting used to, but based on many suggestions from my Truth On Cinema Research and Development Team and the co-owner of ToC (my wife), I have made some changes to emphasize content rather than design.

Features that were added or changed:

-I configured the site so that the entire post is on the front page and there is no excess “clicking through” involved. The only clicking involved is if you want to leave a comment, you’ll have to click the title of the entry or the little comment icon.

-Since Truth On Cinema has evolved from a review-only site to a more complete movie blog, I have eliminated the different categories (genres) of movies, and have tagged every one of my reviews under the category “Review” and have laid them out to the right if you ever want to go back and read them.

-Following along the same line of thought, I have streamlined the navigation and simplified what Truth On Cinema is: [Movie] Reviews, News, Features, Discussions (Round Table), Photos, and Trailers. Those are going to be added/edited as we go along, but that at least simplifies where you can find information.

I hope you enjoy the new ToC and know that in no way is this completely finished as I am still working out all of the kinks to this new look. Please feel free, and I am ASKING you, to let me know what you think and if there are any bugs or suggestions on how to improve this new site. You are the community of Truth On Cinema, so please tell me what you think. I know this won’t work for everyone and that there will be people who like the old style, and who knows, I may return in the future to the old look, but for now, this is where ToC is going.

Thanks for sticking around Truth On Cinema for almost a year (our anniversary is in February) and for all of your support throughout 2008. We are very excited about what 2009 holds for Truth On Cinema. For now, take a look around, reminisce, leave me a note on how your holiday was and what sort of movie(s) you watched or what movie discussions you got into, just hang out and stay for a while.

Daniel DeHart
Senior Editor/Contributor
Truth On Cinema

(photo courtesy of color cubic)

Day Earth Stood Still

As you will come to learn about me here on Truth On Cinema, I am a sucker for big-budget action science fiction films. Some of my most favorite movies (for the action-bid-budget-sci-fi quality, not necessarily story and character development) of all time include Independence Day, Cloverfield, Jurassic Park, Planet of the Apes, The Terminator simply for their action and “sci-fi-ness.” I admit that they aren’t really intelligent dramas nor are they movies that are going to satisfy everyone, but there’s just something about the “doomsday prophecy” storyline that gets me.

I have never seen the original that this movie is based upon so this won’t be a comparison review that currently litter the Internet, instead this will be a subjective review of this movie as it stands on its own. On its own, the short version of my review is

The Day The Earth Stood Still was an hour and twenty minutes of a confusing battle between extraterrestrials and the humans (which is always how it works out isn’t it) and way humans treat the world, with some mild social commentary on how we treat each other as humanity mixed in for measure, that began with about 10 minutes of visual candy as the “beings” enter our atmosphere and we scramble to figure out who they are and why they are here.

Keanu Reeves returns as an alien named “Klaatu” (and by return, I mean he returns as a character that is completely dead-pan, alien-like, and walks around very stiff and “wood-like”, pretty much like everyone of his roles) that is sent to save Earth…from the humans. Once he makes contact with the humans, we naturally act on the defense and take him in for questioning so we can discover why he is here…or better yet, we just want to make sure he’s not here to kill us, because we as American humans are always on the defense against any foreign presence in our midst. Commentary? I’ll let you decide. After he escapes, of course, he tracks down the only human contact to show him any compassion (which there is always one of in every one of these movies, the one person who cares for the alien being) at all, played by the great Jennifer Connelly. The rest of the film is composed of Connelly trying as hard as she can to convince Reeves that we are worth saving and that “yes, we can change, just you wait.”

    Let me take a side note here and tell you how worthless of a character Jaden Smith was. Yes, that’s Will Smith’s son, the same kid in The Pursuit of Happyness that actually did pretty well (I believe it’s because of his father’s presence) in that film. He playes Connelly’s stepson who spends the entire film whining about how much of a non-parent Connelly is compared to his killed-in-action soldier Dad. He shouldn’t have been in this film, and you could have practically cast any young actor and he would have been 10 times better than Jaden. I don’t doubt that he’ll one day follow his father’s footsteps and go on to become a great actor, but for now, go to school and graduate and leave the acting to your Dad.

The effects do well to keep you visually stimulated and entertained, a feat these days that gets easier with every film with the availability of technology, but once that wears off, there’s not enough story or interest in the characters to make this film convincing. I get what they are trying to say, and while I agree that we as humans need to be better to each other, the alien presence of Klaatu and the imminent destruction of the human race in this film, do nothing to encourage any thoughts of how to change. The directors and writers go as far to create the tension and to get you to think about you treat other people, but once again, it’s one of those social commentary films that does just that: it makes comments on our current social climate but adds nothing to the conversation in ways we can change. In essence, this film, despite its impressive effects and imaginative premise, feels like an empty experience.

Content Warning: Rated PG-13 for some sci-fi disaster images and violence. For a disaster film, it’s pretty clean, and the destruction scenes are more artistically interpretive than violent.

Yes Man I have gone on record many times with my love for Jim Carrey and that Dumb & Dumber is and will always be one of my all-time favorite comedies, and it’s with those two loves that I chose to sit down during the holiday season to check out Carrey’s return to what he does best: make people laugh.

Let’s be clear about this: I love funny Jim Carrey, the Carrey from Ace Ventura, Liar Liar, Bruce Almighty and even The Cable Guy and I do love serious Jim Carrey, the Carrey from Man on the Moon, The Truman Show, Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind and even the dark Lemony Snicket’s A Series of Unfortunate Events, and while I don’t think Yes Man is on par with any of his other hilarious hits, it’s still a nice return for him to comedy.

The story is quite simple in that Carrey stars as “Carl Allen,” a mostly-negative loan officer who, after attending a self-help conference that preaches to say “Yes” to all opportunities and propositions, makes a covenant with the conference guru (played pretty well by Terrence Stamp) to say “yes” to everything that comes his way. Naturally, mild hilarity and silly situations ensue as he says “yes” to everything including giving a homeless guy all of his money (which leads him to the love interest, “Allison” played awkwardly, though that’s her usual character so it’s quite charming, by Zooey Deschanel), dressing up and attending a Harry Potter party, agreeing to be sexually pleased by his very old neighbor (which was a scene that totally should have been eliminated and was only left in to attract the PG-13 boys), which are all situations that eventually lead to good and positive changes in his life.

yes-man-picture

And that’s where, to me, the film loses its stamina. It’s almost like the writers didn’t know how to create the conflict, when everything goes his way by saying “yes” to everything, how do you introduce an antagonist if you’re trying to get the message across to be open to possibilities in your life? Well, unfortunately, you only have a couple of hours to accomplish character, story, conflict, resolution, and a climax, and the writers of Yes Man chose the last 25 minutes to introduce the conflict, resolve it, and lead you to the climax of the story. The ending all felt rushed and fake and I didn’t buy the tension that was created when Carl’s (Carrey) automatic agreeing to everything lead to questions of his authenticity in relationships and if he really was being honest or not. They should have started a natural progression of semi-negative consequences from his total “yes-ness” to everything instead of causing the movie to come to sudden halt and present us with a contrived conflict.

One of the things I liked seeing in this movie was Carrey’s age lines. He’s 46 years old and for the first time that I’ve seen in his movies, the man with the rubber face is actually showing signs of aging. I say it’s about time, it was to me a very realistic sign that he can’t do what he does forever. The days of beating the crap out of himself for a laugh are now going to be limited and the toll it takes will be visible. I think you see the beginnings of it in Yes Man. The comedy here is safe, it’s nothing that Carrey is not used to doing, but it’s also not comedy that will blow you away or affect the way you view Carrey. I think this is a safe return to physical and laugh-out-loud comedy for him and maybe it’ll help people forget when he tried VERY HARD to be hardcore and be taken for a twisted-horror-movie-actor with The Number 23. Jim Carrey flat out wants to make people laugh and I think it shows in every comedy he does. His energy is there and he is pretty much always funny (even in the crappy films), I think. I don’t think he needs to ONLY do comedies (Eternal Sunshine and Man on the Moon are 2 of my all-time Carrey favorites) and I don’t think he’s lost it at all.

Content Warning: Rated PG-13 for crude sexual humor, language and brief nudity. This movie could have been a PG family-friendly film with a message if not for the awkward geriatric “sexually pleasing” scene and an ending scene with old people’s butt’s. So, obviously, this film has a lot of geriatric nudity, I didn’t even think about that until afterwords.

Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes

© Copyright Truth On Cinema. All Rights Reserved.