Archive for September, 2008

Movie News (9/30/2008): So, while I reported back in August that Tobey and Sam were coming back for Spider-Man 4, it wasn’t clear yet whether or not Kirsten Dunst was back….well, the news is in, she will be coming back for a fourth Spider Man.

Discussion: I am not a fan of her and never have been, so this news doesn’t excite me really, but I guess for continuity, it makes sense. How do you see her fitting into the new movie? Personally, I’d like to see her get killed off early and turn Peter Parker loose on a revenge-thirsty mission…what do you think?

source: The Movie Blog

Movie News (9/29/2008): At the Disney Showcase last week, it was revealed that Johnny Depp has been cast as ‘Tonto‘ in Disney’s remake of “The Lone Ranger.” When asked about who would play The Lone Ranger himself, supposedly George Clooney himself has expressed interest in the role.

Discussion: What do you think of this upcoming movie, The Lone Ranger? Would this classify as a remake that needs to be made? Can Depp play a Native American? Do you think it will be more of a comedy or action-adventure the likes of National Treasure?

source: Aint It Cool

Every so often I watch movies that don’t really interest me nor do I have a lot to say about them, and yet, I’d still like to keep you informed about them. So, every once in a while I am going to be posting a Mini-Review Roundup which will contain a handful of movies that didn’t necessitate an entire post whether it was because I couldn’t even finish it, it was just “eh” to me, or I can’t bring myself to write more than a paragraph about it.

Rescue Dawn
Christian Bale, Steve Zahn
I know I may get a lot of criticism about this movie, but I’m sorry, I turned it off after about 30 minutes. It never captured my attention, it was super slow, and Christian Bale sounded awful as he was trying way too hard to be some Captain American Super Patriot guy. I had high hopes for this one and was seriously underwhelmed, and I know, I didn’t finish it and if you can convince me otherwise, maybe I’ll give it another try. It seemed like the movie wasn’t even taking itself seriously at all, like it was this true heroic story that the actors were just “ho-humming” through. There were times in the film, well, in the first 30 minutes of the film, that there wasn’t any sound. Either Bale was running through the forest and you couldn’t really hear his breath or the rustle of the trees, nothing. It was an awkward feeling that really turned me off. I don’t know what else to say other than, if you’ve seen it and know that I will like it, leave me some proof via the comments. I WANTED to like this movie. This won’t go down, in my opinion, as one of Christian Bale’s best.

In The Land of Women
Adam Brody, Meg Ryan, Kristen Stewart
Being married affords me opportunities to watch romantic movies that I probably wouldn’t watch on my own accord. This being one of them. Truth is, I really liked this movie a lot. The title, at first, was very unattractive as we sat down to watch this movie, I mean, come on, In The Land of Women?! I had pictures of tea parties and bitter ladies sitting around bashing men, which I know is very stereotypical of me. This movie stars Meg Ryan, Adam Brody, and newcomer Kristen Stewart (who, in a few months, will be playing one of the most-talked-about characters in girls’ ages 13-18 lives, Bella, from Twilight) in this creepy, quirky, heartfelt drama about friendship, forgiveness and the chemistry that can exist between man and woman without the pressures of romance. I have become a new fan of Adam Brody. I will be watching his career…and learning how to style my hair like his. This is worth watching again.

Well, I hoped you enjoyed the first Mini-Review Roundup. If you’ve seen any movies recently and would like to post a little review for us all, this is the place to do it. Just leave a comment with your mini-review and it will be posted for us all to discuss and argue about.

Movie News (9/24/2008): So, it’s OFFICIAL, the I Am Legend prequel is currently in development over at Warner Brothers. Back in July, the talk began about a possible sequel to the very successful post-apocalyptic movie starring Will Smith, and it wasn’t known whether there was enough material to go all the way back before the virus wiped out the Earth. The movie stems from the novel by the same name written by Richard Matheson, and in it, Matheson doesn’t go that far back into Neville’s story. Will Smith will be back as Neville and Richard Lawrence will return to helm the 2nd installment.

Discussion: Personally, I am really excited about this news. I really loved I Am Legend and would love to see how it all started with the wipe out of the Earth. I thought it was one of Smith’s more powerful performances to-date with the entire movie riding on him and him ALONE to get us through it. Is anyone else excited about this prequel?

It seems like Hollywood has run out of ideas. Every new movie idea it seems is just another version of a movie previously released. Whether or it’s an old classic or a continuation of a previous sequel just years later, Hollywood likes to copy and paste…with a twist.

Now, there have been some very successful films over the years that were actually remakes. Films such as Ocean’s Eleven, The Lord of the Rings, The Italian Job, The Departed are just a sampling of some good film remakes that can be done if pursued and produced right.

When deciding whether or not to go the route of creating a remake of a movie, here are some rules/tips that I think every studio should consider before pursuing:

1) Original hasn’t been seen by the majority of the current audience
I think this is the most important rule in creating a remake. I love hearing about a classic story or film being remade and bringing it to the modern audience. There’s no real point in remaking movies like Star Wars or Godfather, everyone has already seen those movies. Bring me an old story, like Moby Dick, and show me a modernized version, keeping true to the story, and that excites me. But taking a series like Ghostbusters that most people have seen and trying to rekindle the flame for this generation’s movie audience doesn’t work for me.

2) The original has to have a good story
Think about it, would you want to see a remake of Bubble Boy, that horrendous movie with Jake Gyllenhaal as a boy who lives in a bubble? Of course not! You know why? Because the story was preposterous and ridiculous, so why remake that?

3) The original movie had to be well liked or had a strong following
What’s the point of remaking a movie that no one liked in the first place? Take films like Robocop and Short Circuit that have lately been rumored to be in the process of remaking, would you say those films warrant a remake? I would say no, due to their underwhelming popularity and success. Now, don’t get me wrong, I love Short Circuit and when I was a young boy, Robocop was a killer cop movie…but I can’t see them being remade now. They weren’t strong enough of movies or had enough success that would justify a modern retelling.

4) There has had to be at least 10-15 years since the original
Before a remake is made, I think there needs to be a legitimate space of time in between the original and when the proposed remake is supposed to debut. If you’ve seen the movie in the last 5-10 years, how would a remake accomplish its goal if it’s fresh on your mind? Take for example, Remember the Titans which came out in 2000, can you see them remaking that movie?

I hope those tips/rules were helpful in determining when it is OK to proceed with creating a remake. I think if they are followed then a GOOD remake could happen…does it mean it will, probably not, but who knows.

Discussion: What other rules would you add to this list?

Movie News (9/23/2008): Variety reports that “Wanted” director Timur Bekmambetov will helm a reimagining of the Herman Melville’s 1851 literary classic “Moby Dick” for Universal Pictures. The screenplay will ditch Ishmael’s narration in favour of a “action-adventure revenge story” that allows the filmmakers to depict the white whale’s decimation of other ships prior to its encounter with Ahab’s Pequod.

Discussion: I never saw Wanted so I don’t know what kind of style this director will bring to Moby Dick, so those that have seen Wanted, what do you think? Is this another one of those famous Scotto “leave-it-as-it-was” stories or do you think Moby Dick can be reimagined in an unique and cool way?

Movie News (9/18/2008): In news that is purely for humor alone, Sony is reporting that none other than David Hasselhoff will be starring in the sequel to 1997′s Beverly Hills Ninja starring the late Chris Farley. Sadly, this isn’t a joke. The writer of the original movie, Mitch Klebanoff, will be making his directorial debut with Chris Farley’s brother, Kevin Farley lending his hand as co-producer.

Discussion: Are you kidding me?! I can hardly stomach the rumors of a proposed Ghostbusters reboot as they will probably RUIN the franchise by doing so, but the idea of a sequel to a movie I don’t even remember seeing is preposterous! What do you guys think? Can you remember anything about the original?

Movie News (9/12/2008): An interview with Jon Favreau over at CHUD reveals some awesome details about the upcoming Iron Man sequel. Among the details revealed, Favreau tell us that:

- He, Justin Theroux and Robert Downey Jr. are already working hard on the script
- War Machine will be in Iron Man 2
- It’s going to be a trilogy
- The Mandarin will be the main arching villain of the trilogy

I know this isn’t a lot, since it’s so early on in the process, but at least it’s exciting to hear that they are already starting to write the script. Having War Machine in the movie will be awesome and I hope that he remains as more of a side character, so they can really push The Mandarin story line, since that IS his main enemy in the comic books.

Movie News (9/11/2008): In news that I’m sure will cause some controversy, Warner Brothers is reporting that they are re-releasing The Dark Knight in IMAX theaters in January, just in time for the Oscars. With The Dark Knight’s current domestic box office total pushing $513 million, it’s obvious that Warner Brothers wants to shoot for that $600 million mark in order to potentially beat Titanic. This re-release is also timed to tie in with the voting season for the Academy Awards, both to highlight the film during that time to remind voters and to capitalize on any buzz from nominations.

Discussion: For me, this is great news! I saw it in the theaters 3 times and never got to experience the IMAX version, so I will gladly drop ten more dollars to see it in January…and just in time for my birthday! HINT HINT! There are also speculative reports saying that Warner Bros. would like to re-release the movie every year as like an event. Does it have the buzz still to push past Titanic? With the DVD release coming out in December, will people be less interested in going to the theaters and just purchase the DVD? Will you go see it in January?

Movie News (9/7/2008): /Film is reporting from a source at DeadlineHollywood that Sony has wrapped up Sam Raimi and Tobey Maguire for Spider-Man 4. The execs’ would like both Spider-Man 4 and Spider-Man 5 to be shot back-to-back, which fits nicely into the story that we broke back in May about James Vanderbilt’s script that he turned in.

In the article, /film discusses who the next villain will be and they surmise that Dr. Connors will be playing “Lizard.” Dr. Connors was played by Dylan Baker in Spider-Man 2 and 3.

Discussion: What do you think about the possibility of shooting back to back? What villain do want to see included? What did/didn’t you like about the Spider-Man franchise?

Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes

© Copyright Truth On Cinema. All Rights Reserved.